Re: [PATCH] %nil-handling optimization and fixes v1

[Mark H Weaver]

Neil Jerram wrote:
> FWIW, dropping "lisp_" looks OK, but I'm not sure about dropping
> "and_".  "scm_is_false_not_nil" feels notably harder to understand
> than "scm_is_false_and_not_nil".

Yes, I see your point, and I agree.

    Mark