[email protected] (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
>> Anyway, that's where I am. Bug-wise we still have a bug in backtraces,
>> which I need to pin down at some point, and update docs -- but generally
>> speaking we're mergeable. What do people think, should I be working on
>> master at some point?
>
> Sure. Neil: what do you think?
No problem, I'm happy for Andy to merge now. (When I mentioned holding
off before, that was while I was looking at branch_release-1-8..master
differences, and I have the results of that saved off somewhere.)
> Looking at `vm', it's been sometime
> since the last merge with `master', so it'd be worth checking that
> things still work.
I guess that would mean merging master into vm first, and checking
that, then merging vm into master.
Regards,
Neil
