Hi, Neil Jerram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The tools for dealing with this format are available, though; see > http://gnuvola.org/software/guile-projects/. OK. > But in any case, if they contain equivalent information, I guess one > protocol (HTML) is as good as another (sexp). Yep, that's what I thought, especially if the latter doesn't buy us much practically, which I suspect. After all, we're just talking about 20 entries or so I suppose, not hundreds. > Do you have something in mind for implementing an automatic > build/sanity check, or are you implying that project maintainers > should confirm that their projects still build with 1.6/1.8 before > resubmitting their entries? I was thinking about something completely manual: send an email to `guile-user' explaining the plan, then wait for submissions and copy/paste them in the page. We could also be kind enough to explicitly email individuals when deemed appropriate, although it's not unreasonable to expect them to hang around `guile-user' IMO. Thanks, Ludovic. _______________________________________________ Guile-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel
