Hi, Neil Jerram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> One immediate worry: for the projects that are up to date, I am > concerned that we would be asking the authors to jump through a new > set of hoops, when they've already jumped nicely through the hoops > that we specified before. OTOH, it's been a while since somebody submitted something, I think, so maybe it's probably not unreasonable to expect authors to be re-submit a thing; or they could just say "keep the previous entry for my project". > Can we not do something using the existing format (assuming that the > records in that format are available somewhere), so as not to require > resubmission of equivalent information? You mean the s-exp-based format? I don't know whether the information was kept in this format somewhere and actually, I don't know what tools are available to deal with it. I think we could work with raw HTML, given that entries are fairly simple. Thanks, Ludovic. _______________________________________________ Guile-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel
