[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ludovic Courtès) writes: > > In the latter case, GC would modify the port table, potentially beneath > the feet of functions that iterate over it, or that cached indices > within the table, things like that.
I think you're meant to hold scm_i_port_table_mutex if looking at or modifying the table. Probably have to make sure not to provoke a gc during that, something I think flush-all doesn't ensure. (Maybe ought to rewrite flush-all in terms of port-for-each.) _______________________________________________ Guile-devel mailing list Guile-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel
