Hi,
Rob Browning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
>
>> If nobody disagrees, I would like to merge `(ice-9 i18n)' in HEAD
>> and 1.8 within a few days "as is" (that is, using a separate shared
>> library and without documenting the C functions, as discussed
>> earlier).
>
> I don't have a strong feeling about the shared library issue as long
> as none of the versioning requirements are broken. However, I'm still
> opposed to the addition of new scm_ functions that aren't intended to
> be public, but don't use the scm_i_ prefix.
Fair enough. Then I think I'll do the following:
1. Keep the shared library (named `libguile-i18n-v-0' in the next 1.8
release).
2. Document its existence as well as the C functions.
I think it's a better plan than renaming the C functions to `scm_i_'.
Thanks,
Ludovic.
_______________________________________________
Guile-devel mailing list
Guile-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel
