Hi, Neil Jerram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I agree with both separate module and separate library. If having a > separate library throws up problems, this can motivate us to address > them. In particular, if we keep it this way for `(ice-9 i18n)', do you think we should document both the existence of `libguile-i18n-vXX' and the C functions that are in this library? The patch I posted only documents the Scheme side, assuming that the C side is "not very useful" (which is debatable). Rob pointed out that since we do have those C functions anyway, then there's no compelling reason not to document them. Thanks, Ludovic. _______________________________________________ Guile-devel mailing list Guile-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel
