[delayed by a mail bounce] Marius Vollmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Should we still support GCC 2.95?
It's still in current debian unstable, so it's not totally dead. Using it guards against some c99-isms (local variables in the middle of functions) so it has some use for development. > * throw.c (scm_ithrow): Remove "asm volatile" hack. It used to > work around a bug in GCC 2.95.2 but is now a bug in itself. Doesn't look so evil as to cause a bug itself ... I put mine conditionalized precisely to gcc==2.95, so as to restrict its effect. All this sort of thing is pretty ugly, but at least if it's tightly delimited then it's clear what you can rip out in 10 years time. _______________________________________________ Guile-devel mailing list Guile-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel
