Kevin Ryde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Should we still support GCC 2.95? > > It's still in current debian unstable, so it's not totally dead.
I had the impression it is only there for compiling old Linux kernels... > Using it guards against some c99-isms (local variables in the middle > of functions) so it has some use for development. Isn't there some option for GCC 4 that warns about those? I think "-std=c89 -ansi -pedantic" might do it. >> * throw.c (scm_ithrow): Remove "asm volatile" hack. It used to >> work around a bug in GCC 2.95.2 but is now a bug in itself. > > Doesn't look so evil as to cause a bug itself ... I think the "asm volatile" hack stopped being accepted by GCC in some version. -- GPG: D5D4E405 - 2F9B BCCC 8527 692A 04E3 331E FAF8 226A D5D4 E405 _______________________________________________ Guile-devel mailing list Guile-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel
