oh my, all that time, what luxury... can you luxuriate on another list, please?
On Thu, Jun 4, 2015 at 5:11 PM, IgnorantGuru <ignorantg...@openmailbox.org> wrote: > On Thu, 4 Jun 2015 17:53:22 -0400 > Paul Davis <p...@linuxaudiosystems.com> wrote: > > > You are the person who began their first post on the bug with "I > > realize that GTK development is effectively dead for non-Gnome > > projects,..." > > Indeed, I do realize that. Perhaps your opinion of the situation > differs. Does that invalidate mine? I was merely saying that I didn't > expect much from them, but in case they were interested in keeping support > alive, here's how they could do it. > > > In your second post, you added "We are doing so here, > > and as usual, those needs are summarily dismissed if not coming from > > Red Hat". It is you who was inflammatory and irrelevant. > > Actually, since a Red Hat employee immediately dismissed the bug (as > usual), and the request didn't come from Red Hat, and I have seen this > behavior numerous times, I found it highly relevant to point out. I don't > view it as inflammatory but challenging. As in, "here is what I find > dissatisfactory in your pattern of responses to bugs like this one." And I > was giving him an opportunity to demonstrate a new response. > > I notice, like Robert Schroll, that you overlook many aspects of their > behavior and are merely nitpicking my choice of words and how I express my > perspective. You don't seem to have any appreciation for differences of > opinion being expressed. > _______________________________________________ > gtk-list mailing list > gtk-list@gnome.org > https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-list >
_______________________________________________ gtk-list mailing list gtk-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-list
