On Thu, 4 Jun 2015 17:53:22 -0400 Paul Davis <p...@linuxaudiosystems.com> wrote:
> You are the person who began their first post on the bug with "I > realize that GTK development is effectively dead for non-Gnome > projects,..." Indeed, I do realize that. Perhaps your opinion of the situation differs. Does that invalidate mine? I was merely saying that I didn't expect much from them, but in case they were interested in keeping support alive, here's how they could do it. > In your second post, you added "We are doing so here, > and as usual, those needs are summarily dismissed if not coming from > Red Hat". It is you who was inflammatory and irrelevant. Actually, since a Red Hat employee immediately dismissed the bug (as usual), and the request didn't come from Red Hat, and I have seen this behavior numerous times, I found it highly relevant to point out. I don't view it as inflammatory but challenging. As in, "here is what I find dissatisfactory in your pattern of responses to bugs like this one." And I was giving him an opportunity to demonstrate a new response. I notice, like Robert Schroll, that you overlook many aspects of their behavior and are merely nitpicking my choice of words and how I express my perspective. You don't seem to have any appreciation for differences of opinion being expressed. _______________________________________________ gtk-list mailing list gtk-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-list
