I've been updating the suppression file to work with the new version of Gtk. I'm getting a few errors for widgets which are deleted by Gtk (using the manage function), which look like this (N.B. it's actually a Gtkmm app):
==13910== 20 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 5,230 of 10,037 ==13910== at 0x4028876: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:236) ==13910== by 0x4E0D80A: standard_malloc (gmem.c:88) ==13910== by 0x4E0DD61: g_malloc (gmem.c:164) ==13910== by 0x4DE9084: g_datalist_id_set_data_full (gdataset.c:467) ==13910== by 0x44B4EE0: (gobject.c:2844) ==13910== by 0x42D17DF: Gtk::Object::disconnect_cpp_wrapper() (object.cc:197) ==13910== by 0x42D18AF: Gtk::Object::_release_c_instance() (object.cc:100) ==13910== by 0x42D1B6B: Gtk::Object::destroy_() (object.cc:260) ==13910== by 0x41EC946: Gtk::CellRendererText::~CellRendererText() (cellrenderertext.cc:202) ==13910== by 0x41ECA11: Gtk::CellRendererText::~CellRendererText() (cellrenderertext.cc:203) ==13910== by 0x42D1383: Gtk::Object::destroy_notify_() (object.cc:229) ==13910== by 0x4477F62: Glib::ObjectBase::destroy_notify_callback_(void*) (objectbase.cc:194) any suggestions for what's causing this leak report and the best way to suppress it? Tom ________________________________________ From: Thomas Harty Sent: 23 November 2011 15:20 To: Andrew Cowie; gtk-app-devel-list@gnome.org Subject: RE: Valgrind questions I've been updating the suppression file to work with the new version of Gtk. I'm getting a few errors for widgets which are deleted by Gtk (using the manage function), which look like this: ________________________________________ From: gtk-app-devel-list-boun...@gnome.org [gtk-app-devel-list-boun...@gnome.org] on behalf of Andrew Cowie [and...@operationaldynamics.com] Sent: 07 October 2011 10:09 To: gtk-app-devel-list@gnome.org Subject: Re: Valgrind questions On Tue, 2011-09-20 at 12:48 +0100, jcup...@gmail.com wrote: > Ooop, thanks. I hadn't realised but I'd not updated the version on the > website for a while. I've put my current one up now and it includes a > thing for g_type_add_interface_static(), as you also found. Might it be a good idea to put the suppression file directly into the GTK sources, and perhaps even distribute it via the -dev / -devel packages for libgtk? Might help the FAQ factor a bit if everyone can just be told to find The Suppression File in /usr/share/something... AfC Sydney _______________________________________________ gtk-app-devel-list mailing list gtk-app-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-app-devel-list _______________________________________________ gtk-app-devel-list mailing list gtk-app-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-app-devel-list
