> Sorry but this point is not clear enough to me. > Do you mean that GTK+ is not stable enough on Windows (XP,Vista,7)?!
Well, that depends on your definition of "stable". It depends much on what the GTK+-using program wants to do, and whether continuous building and testing of the program has been done also on Windows during its development cycle. Taking some already designed and developed random GTK+ program that "runs fine on Linux" and expecting to be able to just compile and run it on Windows without problems just won't work. GTK+ 2 is to some extent usable on Windows, sure. Unfortunately, for some aspects, earlier versions (up to 2.16 or so) are better than the later ones up to the current stable version (2.22). I am fairly sure that GTK+3 will not be usable on Windows until quite some time after the initial release. But I would love to be proven wrong, of course. And yes, I do say all this even if I am by many seen as the maintainer of GTK+ on Windows. As the saying goes, "patches welcome". If you want better cross-platform support, try Qt. (Sure, personally I wouldn't touch it with a stick. But many people actually like C++, poor souls...) --tml _______________________________________________ gtk-app-devel-list mailing list gtk-app-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-app-devel-list
