Martín Vales <mar...@opengeomap.org> writes: > Colin Walters escribió: >> On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 9:12 AM, Behdad Esfahbod <beh...@behdad.org> wrote: >> >>> Lets just say that >>> UTF-16 is at best implementation details of Firefox. >>> >> >> Well, JavaScript is notably UTF-16. Given that the Web, Java and >> .NET
To be honest - aren't web currently XML-based (XHTML & co.)? And isn't UTF-8 default encoding, and acidentally the most widly used, for XML? > >> But yeah, there's no way POSIX/GNOME etc. could switch even if it made >> sense to do so (which it clearly doesn't). >> > Yes, i only talked about the overhead with utf8 outside of glib, only that. > Perhaps the only solution is add more suport to utf16 in glib with > more methods. > Well - what do you mean? Having 2 functions - one reciving utf-16 and one utf-8? To be honest - it doesn't make any sense to me (it would create much mess, double the code, make programming errors easier...). Converting? What's wrong with g_utf16_to_utf8? Regards -- I've probably left my head... somewhere. Please wait untill I find it. Homepage (pl_PL): http://uzytkownik.jogger.pl/ (GNU/)Linux User: #425935 (see http://counter.li.org/) _______________________________________________ gtk-app-devel-list mailing list gtk-app-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-app-devel-list
