-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Thu, Feb 15, 2007 at 08:15:13AM +0100, David Nečas (Yeti) wrote: [...] > Definitely, but I'd put only snippets and smaller examples > to the manual itself. I hope we agree it makes no sense to > put the source of gtk-demo-like programs to the manual.
I heartily agree > So > we have the following possibilities: > > 1. Convince all OS vendors to stop making binary packages > and libglade devs to make these packages instead, with > examples included. > > 2. Convince all OS vendors to include code samples in the > devel/devel-doc package. > > 3. Add a note to a prominent place in the docs that the > source code comes with examples, and let people grab the > real thing instead of what OS vendors decide to > distribute. I'd go with 2 or 3 -- personally I like 2 best (say have an examples subdir of the doc dir which packagers are expected to include in the - -dev or in the -dev-docs package). Nowadays there are just many reasons to stick to the distribution-provided packages, at least for less-seasoned people. Regards - -- tomás -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFF1w0sBcgs9XrR2kYRAln5AJ40XNF+P23Z9pI68QQYVgJSyVTRBQCfZkEW g0+4uTHclVJ9PETVV82UDZE= =lb+9 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ gtk-app-devel-list mailing list gtk-app-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-app-devel-list
