-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Thu, Feb 15, 2007 at 12:00:37AM +0100, David Nečas (Yeti) wrote: > On Wed, Feb 14, 2007 at 02:44:21PM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [...] > libglade developers do not produce any binary packages. > > Their product does come with examples. > > Requiring that the examples have to be included in full in > the text of the manual instead of in a compilable form as > standalone files is silly.
You took it back to the point. I think metaphors don't help much here. The question is whether usage examples belong to the documentation or not. As we see, this question is debatable. Personally, I'd side clearly with the "yes" side. Regards - -- tomás -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFF0/XYBcgs9XrR2kYRAi3BAJ4g3E/refaqwbtgEX921oO6UwLWagCZAeUe BHC3UYcdCnaVUBJ4vGi3Zq8= =36mv -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ gtk-app-devel-list mailing list gtk-app-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-app-devel-list
