Hi, Glenn Washburn wrote: > > > if [ -z "$debug" ] && [ "$RET" -eq "$xfail" ]; then
I wrote: > > If indeed in a successful --xfail test RET must have the value of "$xfail" > > (i guess 1), then it is concise and sufficient. > [...] the only acceptable xfail case is for RET=1. If > RET is greater than 1, that should be considered a hard error (iow a > failure of the test itself and not the thing being tested). How about calling the variable "expected_ret" instead of "xfail" ? This would express in the code that rogue return values are really intended to prevent deletion of the test data. Have a nice day Thomas _______________________________________________ Grub-devel mailing list Grub-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel
