On Wed, Jun 21, 2023 at 03:14:17PM +0200, Julian Andres Klode wrote: > So all we did with the surface in SDL1 was split into window, > surface, renderer, and texture. Instead of drawing into the > surface and then flipping, you build your pixels, then update > a texture, and then copy the texture to the renderer. > > Here we use an empty RGB surface to hold our Pixels, which enables > us to keep most of the code the same. The SDL1 code has been adjusted > to refer to `surface` instead of `window` when trying to access the > properties of the surface. > > This approaches the configuration by adding a new --enable-grub-emu-sdl2 > argument. If set to yes, or auto detected, it disables SDL1 support > automatically. > > This duplicates the `sdl` module block in Makefile.core.def which may > be something to be aware of, but we also don't want to build separate > module.
I'm wondering if it makes sense to keep SDL1 support at all? SDL2 was released almost 10 years ago, I'd suggest to just do a hard switch from SDL1 to SDL2 instead of supporting both. take care, Gerd _______________________________________________ Grub-devel mailing list Grub-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel
