On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 05:34:45PM +0300, Andrei Borzenkov wrote: > 09.09.2015 20:47, Felix Zielcke пишет: > >Am Dienstag, den 08.09.2015, 13:57 -0400 schrieb Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk: > >>On Thu, Sep 03, 2015 at 03:34:29PM -0400, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk > >>wrote: > > > >>I don't know enough about the community (or the history) to > >>>understand it but would very much appreciate input. > >>>And if I have offended somebody with my questions + feeble > >>>analysis: my deepest apologies - and please straighten me out! > >>> > >>> > >>> From what I have gathered so far the not enough reviewers > >>>is tied in folks being overworked - so there simply was no > >>>point of posting on the mailing list as nobody had the time > >>>to review it or test it properly? > >>> > > > >Hi Konrad, > > > >back in 2008/2009 (when Marco Gerards gave over Maintainance to Robert > >Millan) there were indeed not much people actively reviewing code. > > > >Active people on the mailing list was just given commit access. It was > >expected that they only commit stuff without posting which doesn't need > >a review and complies with the rules back at that time. > > > >Due to me missing a few years on the mailing list, I can't tell you > >unfortunately how it compares to today. > > > > Not much changes as far as I can tell.
OK. What qualifies as needing an review? Personal preference by the patch author? Thank you for answering my questions! _______________________________________________ Grub-devel mailing list Grub-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel
