On Thu, Sep 03, 2015 at 03:34:29PM -0400, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > Hey,
Expanding the circle, including folks on the To list. Colin had answered some so snipping thouse out. > > I've noticed a couple of things that the community seems > to be doing different than other open source projects and > was wondering why? And also how to conform to this (or perhaps > it is time to change?) so that ideas/releases/patches can move forward. > .. snip.. > > - Some patches have been posted and hadn't much any architecture > feedback or review. I am referring to Daniel's multboot2 > extensions and the ARM multiboot implementation for example. > > Is that due to the tradition (not sure if that is the right > word) that there aren't enough reviewers so folks shouldn't > expect reviews? > .. snip.. > > > I don't know enough about the community (or the history) to > understand it but would very much appreciate input. > And if I have offended somebody with my questions + feeble > analysis: my deepest apologies - and please straighten me out! > > > From what I have gathered so far the not enough reviewers > is tied in folks being overworked - so there simply was no > point of posting on the mailing list as nobody had the time > to review it or test it properly? > > [*1]: My background is in Linux kernel and Xen Project. _______________________________________________ Grub-devel mailing list Grub-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel
