On 18.01.2014 18:12, Andrey Borzenkov wrote: > В Sat, 18 Jan 2014 17:55:38 +0100 > Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko <phco...@gmail.com> пишет: > >> On 18.01.2014 17:27, Andrey Borzenkov wrote: >>> While on it, pass detected >>> nm arguments instead of hardcoding them. >> please make this part a separate patch. > > is it OK to commit without this part? > could you send the remaining part alone? It's difficult to see throught intermingled patch. >> This would indicate that you >> support non-portable nm output which in this branch isn't the case. Why >> do you need it in the first place? >> > > I do not need it for MinGW case; but it just looks incorrect in general > case - first we check nm arguments and then ignore it. Because relevant support in scripts isn't available yet. > I agree that > mixing two patches was wrong on my side. > > > > _______________________________________________ > Grub-devel mailing list > Grub-devel@gnu.org > https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel >
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Grub-devel mailing list Grub-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel
