В Sat, 18 Jan 2014 17:55:38 +0100 Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko <phco...@gmail.com> пишет:
> On 18.01.2014 17:27, Andrey Borzenkov wrote: > > While on it, pass detected > > nm arguments instead of hardcoding them. > please make this part a separate patch. is it OK to commit without this part? > This would indicate that you > support non-portable nm output which in this branch isn't the case. Why > do you need it in the first place? > I do not need it for MinGW case; but it just looks incorrect in general case - first we check nm arguments and then ignore it. I agree that mixing two patches was wrong on my side.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Grub-devel mailing list Grub-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel
