On 08.03.2012 23:51, Richard Laager wrote:
> I've rebased my patch sets against BZR revision 4144 and tested. Aside
>
> Index: grub/util/grub.d/10_linux.in
> ===================================================================
> --- grub.orig/util/grub.d/10_linux.in 2012-03-08 14:06:00.641410243 -0600
> +++ grub/util/grub.d/10_linux.in 2012-03-08 15:30:53.557993000 -0600
> @@ -61,9 +61,9 @@ case x"$GRUBFS" in
> GRUB_CMDLINE_LINUX="rootflags=subvol=${rootsubvol}
> ${GRUB_CMDLINE_LINUX}"
> fi;;
> xzfs)
> + rpool=`${grub_probe} --device ${GRUB_DEVICE} --target=fs_label
> 2>/dev/null || true`
> bootfs="`make_system_path_relative_to_its_root / | sed -e "s,@$,,"`"
> - LINUX_ROOT_DEVICE="ZFS=${RPOOL}${bootfs}"
> - GRUB_CMDLINE_LINUX="boot=zfs rpool=${RPOOL} bootfs=${RPOOL}${bootfs}
> ${cmdline} ${GRUB_CMDLINE_LINUX}";;
> + LINUX_ROOT_DEVICE="ZFS=${rpool}${bootfs}"
> esac
>
> title_correction_code=
>
Please, don't forget xen counterpart in the future. It's not the first
time I have to fix your patches for them-- Regards Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Grub-devel mailing list Grub-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel
