Am 05.03.2012 01:03, schrieb Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko: >> options? Any special reason? > 2) Why do you refuse to allow short options for all of the menuentry > Because it shares the space with options to menuentry. Don't understand what you mean. What is shared?
>> 3) Wouldn't it be a good chance to use my patch which uses an anonymous >> enum for indexing the options array? > No. Thinking like this is a slippery slope. Such patches may also > contain bugs (if you confuse 2 numbers). > Your patch could be committed into experimental but not trunk. > Life doesn't end at 2.00. Nice joke.... that code right now is a slippery slope... with all those obfuscated numbers. Just my 2 cents... _______________________________________________ Grub-devel mailing list Grub-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel
