Am Donnerstag, den 03.09.2009, 17:36 +0200 schrieb Robert Millan: > On Wed, Sep 02, 2009 at 12:20:19PM +0800, Bean wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > Oh, I was wrong previously, gcc does respect __attribute__ > > ((__regparm__ (3))) flag (I forget to add -Os so it still uses stack > > to store value). And the bug is still there ! Try this test program: > > Thanks Bean. I have opened an entry in GCC bugzilla, and submitted your > test program in it: > > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41246 > > Hopefully they'll fix it in later versions, and hopefully people will > upgrade soon. In the meantime, we're stuck with it. >
Is there any reason why we fallback to regparm 1 and not to regparm 2? According to the output of the testcase in the above bug report 2 seems to work too? -- Felix Zielcke Proud Debian Maintainer _______________________________________________ Grub-devel mailing list Grub-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel
