On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 12:26 AM, David Miller<da...@davemloft.net> wrote: > From: Yves Blusseau <bluss...@zetam.org> > Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2009 21:30:01 +0200 > >> >> Le 1 sept. 09 à 17:43, Bean a écrit : >> >>> IMO, if we are to tackle the NESTED_FUNC_ATTR issue, we should do it >>> properly by removing nested function, this also has other advantages, >>> like allowing to run tools on systems like OSX that doesn't allow to >>> execute code in stack by default. >> >> Agree with Bean, it's the last "issue" that made that we can't run >> tool on OSX directly. > > I agree too, fixing the root issue would be a much better > cure for this rather than alienating everyone who happens > to be using older tools on their computer. > I can't agree with designating nested functions as root issue. Imagine tomorrow we discover a bug in "for" loop compiling. This wouldn't be a reason to replace all "for"s with "while"s. The root issue is compiler bug and it should be fixed The root issue is a compil > > _______________________________________________ > Grub-devel mailing list > Grub-devel@gnu.org > http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel >
-- Regards Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko Personal git repository: http://repo.or.cz/w/grub2/phcoder.git _______________________________________________ Grub-devel mailing list Grub-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel
