On Thu, Sep 03, 2009 at 04:16:27PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 01, 2009 at 05:19:51PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> > (Per a discussion with Robert on IRC, this can be post-1.97 if you
> > like.)
> >
> > Would it make sense for grub-editenv to have a default for the filename?
> > I dislike hardcoding something in package maintainer scripts that needs
> > to match a #define. The interface would be a little awkward since it's
> > grub-editenv FILENAME COMMAND, but we could just say that if you provide
> > only one argument then we use the default filename.
>
> OK after 1.97 is out. Btw, please include a ChangeLog entry next time.
I didn't? Bah, I could have sworn I had ...
2009-09-01 Colin Watson <cjwat...@ubuntu.com>
* util/grub-editenv.c (main): If only a command is given, use
DEFAULT_DIRECTORY "/" GRUB_ENVBLK_DEFCFG as a default file name.
(usage): FILENAME is now optional and has a default.
--
Colin Watson [cjwat...@ubuntu.com]
_______________________________________________
Grub-devel mailing list
Grub-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel
