On Tue, Sep 01, 2009 at 05:19:51PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote: > (Per a discussion with Robert on IRC, this can be post-1.97 if you > like.) > > Would it make sense for grub-editenv to have a default for the filename? > I dislike hardcoding something in package maintainer scripts that needs > to match a #define. The interface would be a little awkward since it's > grub-editenv FILENAME COMMAND, but we could just say that if you provide > only one argument then we use the default filename.
OK after 1.97 is out. Btw, please include a ChangeLog entry next time. -- Robert Millan The DRM opt-in fallacy: "Your data belongs to us. We will decide when (and how) you may access your data; but nobody's threatening your freedom: we still allow you to remove your data and not access it at all." _______________________________________________ Grub-devel mailing list Grub-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel
