Am Freitag, den 31.07.2009, 18:19 +0200 schrieb Robert Millan: > On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 11:45:35AM -0400, Pavel Roskin wrote: > > On Thu, 2009-07-30 at 15:05 +0200, adrian15 wrote: > > > Felix Zielcke escribió: > > > > I think the currently under development part can be now removed. > > > > Or would it be better to wait for the 1.97 release? (which hopefully > > > > comes before December) > > > That would be nice because Debian freezes at December. > > > > I don't see anything wrong with being "under development". I hope that > > GRUB 2 will be under development even after the 1.97. I don't see how > > Debian can have any problem with that. > > It depends. If we say GRUB 2 is "under development" but we don't say anything > about GRUB Legacy, people might think GRUB 2 is not ready. > > I agree with Pavel, saying GRUB 2 is under development doesn't fail to the > truth, but then again there are many ways of saying the truth. I think we > should make the website give a clear message that: > > a) GRUB Legacy is obsolete and we don't longer support it > > b) GRUB 2 is more mature than GRUB Legacy >
Good idea. I just think that I'm not good at proposing a good wording for it. And maybe we should wait untill 1.97 gets released before telling grub2 is more mature then grub-legacy. -- Felix Zielcke Proud Debian Maintainer _______________________________________________ Grub-devel mailing list Grub-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel
