On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 11:45:35AM -0400, Pavel Roskin wrote: > On Thu, 2009-07-30 at 15:05 +0200, adrian15 wrote: > > Felix Zielcke escribió: > > > I think the currently under development part can be now removed. > > > Or would it be better to wait for the 1.97 release? (which hopefully > > > comes before December) > > That would be nice because Debian freezes at December. > > I don't see anything wrong with being "under development". I hope that > GRUB 2 will be under development even after the 1.97. I don't see how > Debian can have any problem with that.
It depends. If we say GRUB 2 is "under development" but we don't say anything about GRUB Legacy, people might think GRUB 2 is not ready. I agree with Pavel, saying GRUB 2 is under development doesn't fail to the truth, but then again there are many ways of saying the truth. I think we should make the website give a clear message that: a) GRUB Legacy is obsolete and we don't longer support it b) GRUB 2 is more mature than GRUB Legacy -- Robert Millan The DRM opt-in fallacy: "Your data belongs to us. We will decide when (and how) you may access your data; but nobody's threatening your freedom: we still allow you to remove your data and not access it at all." _______________________________________________ Grub-devel mailing list Grub-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel
