On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 10:37 AM, Battail Yannick<yannick.batt...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Am Donnerstag, den 30.07.2009, 11:45 -0400 schrieb Pavel Roskin: >>> On Thu, 2009-07-30 at 15:05 +0200, adrian15 wrote: >>> > Felix Zielcke escribiĂł: >>> > > I think the currently under development part can be now removed. >>> > > Or would it be better to wait for the 1.97 release? (which hopefully >>> > > comes before December) >>> > That would be nice because Debian freezes at December. >>> >>> I don't see anything wrong with being "under development". I hope that >>> GRUB 2 will be under development even after the 1.97. I don't see how >>> Debian can have any problem with that. >>> >> >> Well to me it just sounds that isn't at all usable for an average user >> and not that it's actively developed. >> IIRC Colin Watson from the debian-installer team even told me this when >> I asked first about changing the grub2 instead of grub-legacy template >> in grub-installer. That says still that grub2 is experimental software. >> But okay if we want to keep it and d-i team refuses to change that just >> because of that part in the grub2 website, then I just accept that. >> > > We should say that version 1.97 is stable and version 1.98 is in development. This is to be decided by maintainer > > Why GRUB two is in version one dot ninety seven not version two dot ... ? > Because 2.0 is our first goal and now we're at (2.0 - 0.035) > > _______________________________________________ > Grub-devel mailing list > Grub-devel@gnu.org > http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel >
-- Regards Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko Personal git repository: http://repo.or.cz/w/grub2/phcoder.git _______________________________________________ Grub-devel mailing list Grub-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel
