> Am Donnerstag, den 30.07.2009, 11:45 -0400 schrieb Pavel Roskin: >> On Thu, 2009-07-30 at 15:05 +0200, adrian15 wrote: >> > Felix Zielcke escribiĂł: >> > > I think the currently under development part can be now removed. >> > > Or would it be better to wait for the 1.97 release? (which hopefully >> > > comes before December) >> > That would be nice because Debian freezes at December. >> >> I don't see anything wrong with being "under development". I hope that >> GRUB 2 will be under development even after the 1.97. I don't see how >> Debian can have any problem with that. >> > > Well to me it just sounds that isn't at all usable for an average user > and not that it's actively developed. > IIRC Colin Watson from the debian-installer team even told me this when > I asked first about changing the grub2 instead of grub-legacy template > in grub-installer. That says still that grub2 is experimental software. > But okay if we want to keep it and d-i team refuses to change that just > because of that part in the grub2 website, then I just accept that. >
We should say that version 1.97 is stable and version 1.98 is in development. Why GRUB two is in version one dot ninety seven not version two dot ... ? _______________________________________________ Grub-devel mailing list Grub-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel
