On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 06:26:02PM +0800, Bean wrote: > On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 5:44 PM, Robert Millan<r...@aybabtu.com> wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 11:38:35AM +0800, Bean wrote: > >> > > >> > I'm feeling uneasy about having a parser in GRUB that is not used by > >> > default, but it's not related to the quality of the patch. > >> > >> Actually, this is about to change. > > > > I don't mind LUA being supported if it's useful for some users, but I'm > > not satisfied with ditching GRUB scripting engine with something external. > > > > We really should discuss it with Marco or Okuji before changing the > > default parser to something else. > > Hi, > > No need to change the default parser, with the #! syntax, we can call > the lua script from main grub.cfg, and the parser will switch back to > sh on return, something like this:
Ok, that's nice. I was more thinking about our grub.cfg-generation scripts though. I think those should stay with the current parser. -- Robert Millan The DRM opt-in fallacy: "Your data belongs to us. We will decide when (and how) you may access your data; but nobody's threatening your freedom: we still allow you to remove your data and not access it at all." _______________________________________________ Grub-devel mailing list Grub-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel
