On Tuesday 07 April 2009 01:43:17 Bean wrote: > On Sat, Apr 4, 2009 at 8:53 PM, Bean <bean12...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Sat, Apr 4, 2009 at 5:30 PM, Yoshinori K. Okuji <ok...@enbug.org> wrote: > >> I've undone r2063, since we're still discussing how to / not to split > >> modules. Bean, you must respect teamwork. If you are unable to follow > >> such a fundamental rule, I will have to disable your permission. > > > > Hi, > > > > I thought the previous mail is about replacing grub_printf with > > grub_dprint, I'm ok with that. This patch has been in mail list for > > sometime, it is essential to get a working display in intel macs. > > Hi, > > How about this patch ? The split is necessary as it introduces new > command loadbios and fakebios that uses the fake_bios_data function, > and it would be ugly to put them all inside linux.c.
Do you have any strong reason to make loadbios and fakebios separate? I think the overhead is negligible. Regards, Okuji _______________________________________________ Grub-devel mailing list Grub-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel
