On Wednesday 01 April 2009 22:19:00 Robert Millan wrote: > GRUB is in dire need of an active project lead. I'm happy to see what you > plan to take back on that role. Over the last few months, I tried to cover > up for some of the work you and Marco weren't doing, like processing the > patches nobody wanted to look at, or requesting copyright assignments. > TBH, it wasn't a pleasant task, and if you'll be doing it from now on, it's > a relief for me.
Well, I don't like that so much, either. So I appreciate if you can continue to do that. :p > As for reverting changes, I acknowledge you have the authority to do that, > but it would be very harmful to the project if all sort of things started > being reverted with no proper discussion. When I say harmful, I mean that > some people might end up sticking with their own private trees, which later > can't easily be merged. It's very important to build consensus on such > things. > > So my suggestion is that you bring up discussion on which things you plan > to revert. If we can't reach consensus, you have the authority to impose > your own view, but please try to find consensus, and be open to arguments > that might convince your POV. > > To summarize, I approve of your decision, but I'd be very disappointed if > all this just happens so you can revert a bunch of stuff and inmediately > afterwards we're left with no active maintainer again. Thank you for your comment. I fully understand what you mean. I will take care. Regards, Okuji _______________________________________________ Grub-devel mailing list Grub-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel
