Bean wrote: > Also, some thoughts about grub2 authority. I do understand the needs > to keep source clean and safe for a boot loader, but sometimes the > process just seems too slow. For example, Colin's graphic menu patch > has been pending for almost half a year. IMO, if a patch implement a > generally useful feature, have no serious design faults, and don't > conflict with other parts of grub2, then it's safe to commit. For > small issues, we could fix it later.
Most of the patches has been already approved with minor changes. Colin has his commit rights to the repository. If he do not feel like committing the code in (no time to cleanup or what ever the reason is), who is anyone else having any say to commit them in? Of course there is really old version that needs some rewriting after GSoC there, but other than that it is in my opinion really Colin's responsibility to contribute/commit the code in. _______________________________________________ Grub-devel mailing list Grub-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel
