On Sat, Feb 28, 2009 at 1:41 PM, Bean <bean12...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 28, 2009 at 3:54 AM, Robert Millan <r...@aybabtu.com> wrote:
>> On Sun, Feb 15, 2009 at 11:14:18PM +0800, Bean wrote:
>>> diff --git a/conf/sparc64-ieee1275.rmk b/conf/sparc64-ieee1275.rmk
>>> index 640ceda..18c108e 100644
>>> --- a/conf/sparc64-ieee1275.rmk
>>> +++ b/conf/sparc64-ieee1275.rmk
>>
>> Don't bother updating sparc64-ieee1275.rmk, it's completely broken by now.
>>
>>> void
>>> grub_term_register_input (grub_term_input_t term)
>>> {
>>> - term->next = grub_term_list_input;
>>> - grub_term_list_input = term;
>>> - if (! grub_cur_term_input)
>>> - grub_term_set_current_input (term);
>>> + grub_handler_register (&grub_term_input_class, GRUB_AS_HANDLER (term));
>>> }
>>
>> Is grub_handler_register() always used this way? Perhaps it should be
>> inline.
>
> Hi,
>
> Good point. In fact, I change all occurrence of
> grub_term_register_input to grub_handler_register previously, but
> considered the amount of code to change, I decide to provide the
> wrapper function grub_term_register_input. Using inline function would
> utilize the new handler infrastructure while retaining code
> compatibility.
Hi,
Fixed and committed.
--
Bean
_______________________________________________
Grub-devel mailing list
Grub-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel
