On Sat, Feb 28, 2009 at 3:54 AM, Robert Millan <r...@aybabtu.com> wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 15, 2009 at 11:14:18PM +0800, Bean wrote:
>> diff --git a/conf/sparc64-ieee1275.rmk b/conf/sparc64-ieee1275.rmk
>> index 640ceda..18c108e 100644
>> --- a/conf/sparc64-ieee1275.rmk
>> +++ b/conf/sparc64-ieee1275.rmk
>
> Don't bother updating sparc64-ieee1275.rmk, it's completely broken by now.
>
>> void
>> grub_term_register_input (grub_term_input_t term)
>> {
>> - term->next = grub_term_list_input;
>> - grub_term_list_input = term;
>> - if (! grub_cur_term_input)
>> - grub_term_set_current_input (term);
>> + grub_handler_register (&grub_term_input_class, GRUB_AS_HANDLER (term));
>> }
>
> Is grub_handler_register() always used this way? Perhaps it should be
> inline.
Hi,
Good point. In fact, I change all occurrence of
grub_term_register_input to grub_handler_register previously, but
considered the amount of code to change, I decide to provide the
wrapper function grub_term_register_input. Using inline function would
utilize the new handler infrastructure while retaining code
compatibility.
--
Bean
_______________________________________________
Grub-devel mailing list
Grub-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel
