On Mon, Sep 08, 2008 at 10:59:02PM +0200, Javier Martín wrote: > El lun, 08-09-2008 a las 23:25 +0300, Vesa Jääskeläinen escribió: > > Javier Martín wrote: > > > El lun, 08-09-2008 a las 22:48 +0300, Vesa Jääskeläinen escribió: > > >> phcoder wrote: > > >>> Hello. As I said in another email there is no need for it. I send a > > >>> patch for it. > > >> Doesn't this break our rescue mode ? > > > How would it? As with other commands, there would be two versions of it, > > > one for rescue and one for normal. Besides, what is the point in having > > > the "boot" command in kernel -and thus always available- if you can't > > > load a kernel to boot? > > > > You may want to chainload something? > Isn't "chainloader" also a command external to the kernel? I recall > seeing _chain.mod (rescue) and chain.mod (normal). So, as long as those > don't go with core.img, you won't chainload a thing.
It is. We just happen to load it by default on i386-pc. -- Robert Millan The DRM opt-in fallacy: "Your data belongs to us. We will decide when (and how) you may access your data; but nobody's threatening your freedom: we still allow you to remove your data and not access it at all." _______________________________________________ Grub-devel mailing list Grub-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel
