El lun, 08-09-2008 a las 23:25 +0300, Vesa Jääskeläinen escribió: > Javier Martín wrote: > > El lun, 08-09-2008 a las 22:48 +0300, Vesa Jääskeläinen escribió: > >> phcoder wrote: > >>> Hello. As I said in another email there is no need for it. I send a > >>> patch for it. > >> Doesn't this break our rescue mode ? > > How would it? As with other commands, there would be two versions of it, > > one for rescue and one for normal. Besides, what is the point in having > > the "boot" command in kernel -and thus always available- if you can't > > load a kernel to boot? > > You may want to chainload something? Isn't "chainloader" also a command external to the kernel? I recall seeing _chain.mod (rescue) and chain.mod (normal). So, as long as those don't go with core.img, you won't chainload a thing.
signature.asc
Description: Esta parte del mensaje está firmada digitalmente
_______________________________________________ Grub-devel mailing list Grub-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel
