On Tue, Sep 02, 2008 at 03:55:18PM +0200, Marco Gerards wrote: > > [...] > > >> We could write a macro for ID comparison that would compare both the > >> "driver ID" (disk->dev->id) and "device ID" (disk->id). In this case, > >> we can omit disk->id initialization in the drivers supporting only one > >> device (e.g. memdisk) and only leave it where it's indeed needed for > >> identifying separate devices, thus removing potentially confusing code. > > > > Sounds fine, although what worries me most if the current usage of 'id' in > > scsi.c, which can lead to collision already. > > > > I assume using LUNs is a proper solution for that one? > > No, it is not. I think I already said so on IRC?
If you did, I must have missed it. In any case, what can we use instead of that? -- Robert Millan The DRM opt-in fallacy: "Your data belongs to us. We will decide when (and how) you may access your data; but nobody's threatening your freedom: we still allow you to remove your data and not access it at all." _______________________________________________ Grub-devel mailing list Grub-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel
