El mar, 05-08-2008 a las 17:48 +0200, Marco Gerards escribió: > Vesa Jääskeläinen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Marco Gerards wrote: > >> Colin D Bennett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >>> I think we should remove conf/*.mk from the Subversion repository. If > >>> people are going to be developing on GRUB and checking out svn > >>> branches, then I think it's fine to require them to have Ruby. For > >>> released tarballs that we expect non-developers to use, we just need to > >>> generate the *.mk files and include them in the tarball. > >> > >> I do not have problems with this. Besides this, it will stop people > >> from sending in patches with .mk changes in it :-) > > > > I think Okuji's objection is based on fact that it makes it harder for > > people to compile from sources. Now what if we would generate those > > files when making a release? Of course this should be enabled to > > script/makefile to make it automatically so it is not forgotten ;) > > Right. Just to be clear, personally I didn't have these objections > but Okuji has. > > Actually, since ruby is required to generate these files, I guess we > can better keep the .mk files. Why not rewrite genmk.rb in a more common language (i.e. with an interpreter more commonly found in stock GNU installs) like Python or Perl?
Habbit
signature.asc
Description: Esta parte del mensaje está firmada digitalmente
_______________________________________________ Grub-devel mailing list Grub-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel
