Vesa Jääskeläinen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Marco Gerards wrote: >> Colin D Bennett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >>> I think we should remove conf/*.mk from the Subversion repository. If >>> people are going to be developing on GRUB and checking out svn >>> branches, then I think it's fine to require them to have Ruby. For >>> released tarballs that we expect non-developers to use, we just need to >>> generate the *.mk files and include them in the tarball. >> >> I do not have problems with this. Besides this, it will stop people >> from sending in patches with .mk changes in it :-) > > I think Okuji's objection is based on fact that it makes it harder for > people to compile from sources. Now what if we would generate those > files when making a release? Of course this should be enabled to > script/makefile to make it automatically so it is not forgotten ;)
Right. Just to be clear, personally I didn't have these objections but Okuji has. Actually, since ruby is required to generate these files, I guess we can better keep the .mk files. -- Marco _______________________________________________ Grub-devel mailing list Grub-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel
