Robert Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Fri, Feb 01, 2008 at 12:36:36PM +0100, Yoshinori K. Okuji wrote: >> On Wednesday 30 January 2008 13:36, Bean wrote: >> > > Do you have a more generic solution to this? Something that can be >> > > compared with NESTED_FUNC_ATTR? This is an i386 only bug... >> > >> > perhaps define NESTED_FUNC_ADDR2 as __attribute__ ((regparm(1))) ? >> >> Is it bad to just change the definition of NESTED_FUNC_ADDR to use >> regparm(1)? >> I know that it is not optimal, but does anybody care? > > I don't..
And fine for me :-) -- Marco _______________________________________________ Grub-devel mailing list Grub-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel
