On Fri, Feb 01, 2008 at 12:36:36PM +0100, Yoshinori K. Okuji wrote: > On Wednesday 30 January 2008 13:36, Bean wrote: > > > Do you have a more generic solution to this? Something that can be > > > compared with NESTED_FUNC_ATTR? This is an i386 only bug... > > > > perhaps define NESTED_FUNC_ADDR2 as __attribute__ ((regparm(1))) ? > > Is it bad to just change the definition of NESTED_FUNC_ADDR to use > regparm(1)? > I know that it is not optimal, but does anybody care?
I don't.. -- Robert Millan <GPLv2> I know my rights; I want my phone call! <DRM> What use is a phone call… if you are unable to speak? (as seen on /.) _______________________________________________ Grub-devel mailing list Grub-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel
