Robert Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, Jan 15, 2008 at 12:42:39PM -0500, Pavel Roskin wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, 2008-01-15 at 18:17 +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
>> > - grub_dprintf ("mem", "Using memory for heap: addr=%p, size=%u\n",
>> > addr, (unsigned int) size);
>> > + grub_dprintf ("mem", "Using memory for heap: start=%p, end=%p\n",
>> > addr, addr + size);
>>
>> Maybe addr+size-1 would be better? Inclusive boundaries are more
>> intuitive. Just run "cat /proc/iomem" to see what I mean.
>
> Sounds better to me.
>
> Does this change (with addr + size -1) sound fine to everyone else?
Why not showing both the range and the size. Isn't the size useful
sometimes? I hate calculating such things by hand...
--
Marco
_______________________________________________
Grub-devel mailing list
Grub-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel
