Robert Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, Jan 21, 2008 at 06:02:20PM +0100, Marco Gerards wrote:
>> Robert Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>> > On Tue, Jan 15, 2008 at 12:42:39PM -0500, Pavel Roskin wrote:
>> >>
>> >> On Tue, 2008-01-15 at 18:17 +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
>> >> > - grub_dprintf ("mem", "Using memory for heap: addr=%p, size=%u\n",
>> >> > addr, (unsigned int) size);
>> >> > + grub_dprintf ("mem", "Using memory for heap: start=%p, end=%p\n",
>> >> > addr, addr + size);
>> >>
>> >> Maybe addr+size-1 would be better? Inclusive boundaries are more
>> >> intuitive. Just run "cat /proc/iomem" to see what I mean.
>> >
>> > Sounds better to me.
>> >
>> > Does this change (with addr + size -1) sound fine to everyone else?
>>
>> Why not showing both the range and the size. Isn't the size useful
>> sometimes?
>
> When? What you typicaly want to debug is whether your mem region overlaps
> with something else, or so.
Well, it is fine for me. If I need the size, I will bring this up
again. Feel free to commit the patch as suggested.
--
Marco
_______________________________________________
Grub-devel mailing list
Grub-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel
