On Sun, Nov 18, 2007 at 12:09:25PM +0100, Marco Gerards wrote: > Robert Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > On Fri, Nov 09, 2007 at 10:53:23PM +0100, Christian Franke wrote: > >> >Ah, and why 0xcf instead of 0xff ? > >> > > >> > > >> > >> ... or 0xaa or 0x55. > > > > 0xaa and 0x55 are typicaly used directly in memory because every bit is > > negated, which is precisely what `^ 0xff' would do. > > Robert, can you take care of this patch? You have more expertise with > this than I do :-)
Sure. -- Robert Millan <GPLv2> I know my rights; I want my phone call! <DRM> What use is a phone call, if you are unable to speak? (as seen on /.) _______________________________________________ Grub-devel mailing list Grub-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel
