On Fri, Nov 09, 2007 at 10:53:23PM +0100, Christian Franke wrote: > >Ah, and why 0xcf instead of 0xff ? > > > > > > ... or 0xaa or 0x55.
0xaa and 0x55 are typicaly used directly in memory because every bit is negated, which is precisely what `^ 0xff' would do. -- Robert Millan <GPLv2> I know my rights; I want my phone call! <DRM> What use is a phone call, if you are unable to speak? (as seen on /.) _______________________________________________ Grub-devel mailing list Grub-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel
