On Wednesday 26 April 2006 10:57, Marco Gerards wrote: > "Yoshinori K. Okuji" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > On Wednesday 26 April 2006 01:22, Hollis Blanchard wrote: > >> Is there a reason not to use the runtime debugging infrastructure we > >> have? Most of that is "intensive" as well... > > > > What do you mean by "the runtime debugging infrastructure"? If you mean > > grub_dprintf, it is not enough, since you cannot embed file names and > > line numbers where the functions are called. > > IIRC this is being done automatically. Or do I misunderstand > something?
Yes. My point is that I want to embed such information into where malloc/realloc/memalign/free is called, but not grub_dprintf is called. If you use grub_dprintf, you must embed grub_dprintf into so many places manually. My way does not require such rewriting. Okuji _______________________________________________ Grub-devel mailing list Grub-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel
